From 1962 to 1965, the Beatles already had quite the distinctive sound, but weren't yet fully developed as songwriters. As such, many of their earlier tunes were covers. So, the question with these 24 covers is... did the Beatles play it better than the original? Well, I have attempted to answer that question for each and every song they have covered! I am going to give a quick synopsis here detailing my opinion for each song the Beatles covered. And I will place each song into 5 different categories: Beatles version vastly superior, Beatles version better, Original vastly superior, Original better, or... a tie if I really can't decide. Without further ado, let's begin with one of the first songs the Beatles covered on record.
 |
Here are the lads in 1963, right as their career was about to explode. |
Anna (Go to Him): We start off with a fantastic performance for both the original and the Beatles' cover. Arthur Alexander recorded this song in 1962, and his soulful rendition is really worth a listen. But the Beatles' beautiful harmonies make their version just as triumphant. It's one of the best songs on their first album, Please Please Me. Final verdict: It's a tie!
 |
Arthur Alexander and The Beatles both did a stellar job with this song. |
Chains: The Beatles were true fans of the girl group sound, as we'll see throughout this list. They took this 1962 song from The Cookies. And while George Harrison did a fine job singing lead on the Beatles' cover, the jazzy original wins out for me. Although, I do have to mention John Lennon's epic opening harmonica solo. Final verdict: Original version better
Boys: Maybe I'm crazy in saying this, but I swear Ringo is underrated as a vocalist. In this song, they take a solid Shirelles original, and add the charisma we know the Beatles are capable of. Ringo's vocal is full of energy, and I love how he kicks off the guitar solo with "All right, George!". There may be saxophone on the 1960 original, but that's still not enough. Final verdict: Beatles version better
Baby It's You: This time the Shirelles do it better than the Beatles. The Beatles version, though decent, is one of the more flat performances on their sizzling opening album. The Shirelles, in comparison, have a haunting quality to each "sha la la la la la". Their 1961 original also features an organ solo which adds to the tension of the song. Final verdict: Original version better
 |
The Beatles were clearly fans of The Shirelles, covering two of their songs. |
A Taste of Honey: Paul's cheesy vocal helps makes this the worst song off "Please Please Me", as John Lennon aptly called their cover "A Waste of Money". So, was the 1962 Lenny Welch original any better? Yes, quite so. Welch delivers each line with a Roy Orbison-esque smoothness, and is backed up with some sparkling harmony. It's still the same cheesy song at its core, but with a much better delivery. Final verdict: Original vastly superior
Twist and Shout: Originally this was recorded by the Top Notes, but since their version was not a hit, we're going off the Isley Brothers (since that's likely the one the Beatles heard). And no disrespect to the Isley Brothers' 1962 version, but it's hard to top John Lennon's iconic vocal on their fantastic cover. There's a reason it's the Beatles' version in Ferris Bueller's Day Off. Final verdict: Beatles vastly superior
Till There Was You: This song was popularized by The Music Man in 1957, but the first recording came right before that. It was done by 17-year old Sue Raney, and what a pretty rendition it is. Filled with lush orchestration, it was a typical traditional pop song of the time. I slightly prefer The Beatles' more Latin-flavored cover, where Paul of course does a great job on vocal. Final verdict: Beatles version better
 |
Sue Raney recorded a very sweet original version of this song. |
Please Mr. Postman: The Marvelletes' 1961 original was really good, no doubt about it. But by the time the Beatles made "With The Beatles", John Lennon was absolutely killing it with his vocals. You can tell the Beatles lived the "Mr. Postman" life, with their ventures in Germany not too long in the past. This is close to a tie, but I gotta give a slight nod to the lads. Final verdict: Beatles version better
Roll Over Beethoven: This is a tough one. As a guitarist, Chuck Berry was one of the Beatles' idols. But as a vocalist, let's be real... The Beatles were better, and that includes George Harrison. The rhythm on the Beatles' version, along with George's vocal, is infectious. But we know Chuck was a guitar virtuoso, and his solo on the 1956 rock 'n roll original definitely tops George's. I like both for different reasons. Final verdict: It's a tie!
 |
Chuck Berry's rock 'n roll was a huge inspiration to The Beatles. |
You Really Got a Hold on Me: No disrespect towards Smokey Robinson and the Miracles, but... John Lennon and George Harrison harmonizing on this one is just fantastic. Also, fifth Beatle George Martin captures your attention with that opening piano. The Beatles were truly evolving from their sound in the first album, doing better than even their Motown idols (whose original is also great). Final verdict: Beatles version better
Devil in Her Heart: The 1962 original was by a girl group, so it was actually called "Devil in His Heart". The little known group, known as the Donays, sang this obscure B-side that the Beatles appreciated. And, the Donays do better than the Beatles on this one! Lead singer Yvonne Symington's passion beats out George Harrison's more flat performance here. Final verdict: Original version better
 |
The only picture I could find of The Donays... and they did better than The Beatles here! |
Money (That's What I Want): Barrett Strong's original was good, no doubt about it. The 18-year old was backed up by quite the jazzy band. But the Beatles just take it to new heights. That includes George Martin's infectious piano, John's scream and ballsy lead vocals, and Paul and George doing a fantastic job backing him up with "That's... what I want!". I love their cover. Final verdict: Beatles vastly superior
Long Tall Sally: As a young man, Paul was known as the best Little Richard impersonator in Liverpool. But he was just that, an impersonator. And when it comes to Little Richard, nothing quite tops the original man himself. In terms of piano riff, then "woooo!", Little Richard was simply the best. So despite Paul's best efforts, I gotta give it to the 1956 original. Final verdict: Original version better
 |
The Beatles meet their idol, Little Richard, in 1962. Notice how happy Paul looks! |
Slow Down: Well, I know I like John Lennon's vocal better than the Larry Williams original on this one. But literally everything else about the Larry Williams version is better. The Beatles rhythm section is just sloppy on their cover, with an abysmal guitar solo from George somehow making the cut. Compare that to the epic sax solo on Larry's 1958 version, and I gotta give it to him. Final verdict: Original version better
Matchbox: The rhythm on both the Beatles' and Carl Perkins's 1957 original are very, very similar. So, what could possibly be the tiebreaker? Well, I'm gonna say it again, Ringo is an underappreciated vocalist! His energy on this performance truly outshines Perkins. So in spite of Carl's rockabilly twang, I'm gonna have to go with Ringo's Liverpudlian-ness here. Final verdict: Beatles version better
 |
Ringo had a penchant for covering songs with a Western vibe. |
Rock and Roll Music: This 1957 rock 'n roll classic once again comes again from Chuck Berry. And his vocals are... rather uninspiring in my opinion. Compare that to the incredibly energetic performance from The Beatles. And I mean both John Lennon's vocal, as well as a frantic band backing him up. It's just better than Chuck in every way, in this case. Final verdict: Beatles vastly superior
Mr. Moonlight: Dr. Feelgood and the Interns recorded this song originally in 1962. Both The Beatles' and the original recording are... just okay. The Beatles' version is more distinguished for John's incredible high note to open the song, but also panned for Paul's cheesy organ solo, which critic Ian MacDonald describes as "ghastliness". Nothing really to check out on both sides. Final verdict: Meh... it's a tie.
Kansas City/Hey Hey Hey Hey: Well, this one is complicated. "Kansas City" was originally recorded by Little Willie Littlefield, while "Hey Hey Hey Hey" was originally recorded by Little Richard. Paul's rockin' vocals certainly topped Littlefield here, but they may have even topped Little Richard as well. This medley was quite the strong performance. Final verdict: Beatles version better
Words of Love: Buddy Holly recorded this tender song in 1957, and it's a pretty product that is reminiscent of his song "Everyday". But the Beatles outdo their late hero and icon, as the magic of the Lennon-McCartney harmony makes this quite the underrated track. Not to mention, the jangly guitar from George fits right in as well. Final verdict: Beatles version better
 |
The Beatles outperform the rock 'n roll legend on "Words of Love". |
Honey Don't: It's round two of Carl Perkins vs. Ringo, and Carl wins this round. Rockabilly twang is well-suited to this ditty. Again, the rhythm section is quite similar on both songs, but I prefer the Sun Records vibes of the 1956 original. In terms of his style at the time, Carl was basically Elvis-lite. Final verdict: Original version better
Everybody's Trying to Be My Baby: Another Carl Perkins song! Again, the Beatles didn't change much in their cover, except for the fact that George Harrison is singing instead. Their carbon copy means it's hard to really tell any differences. Both are solid, if not spectacular performances. Final verdict: It's a tie!
Bad Boy: This time it's round two of John Lennon vs. Larry Williams. Once again, Lennon's voice shines, as he rocks on about the life of a juvenile delinquent. But also once again, Larry's original is suited to R&B, with its shuffling sax. The original also punctuated each line with "He's a... bad boy". This is another one where I like them for different reasons. Final verdict: It's a tie!
 |
Larry Williams, a rock 'n roller that John Lennon was a huge fan of. |
Act Naturally: Ringo once again plays the role of a country/western singer, this time singing the 1963 Buck Owens song. Owens felt hip with the youth when he heard that The Beatles had covered one of his songs, and his original version turned out to be better. He had a country twang that Ringo obviously didn't have, so while The Beatles' cover is spirited, it's not quite as good. Final verdict: Original version better
Dizzy Miss Lizzy: The Beatles were big fans of Larry Williams, as seen with this being their third cover of his. Much like with "Slow Down", John Lennon's vocal is a bit better, but everything else about Larry's version is better. On The Beatles version, the repetitive guitar lick becomes a headache, rather dizzying you could say. But on Larry's version, it blends in with the epic sax in the back. Final verdict: Original version better
Well, that just about ends my list! The final tally is:
- 1 song where The Beatles were completely outplayed
- 8 songs where the covers were better
- 5 ties, where I couldn't decide whose was better
- 7 songs where the Beatles were better
- 3 songs where the Beatles completely outplayed the original.
Do you agree or disagree with my assessments? Let me know in the comments.